GDPR › GDPR Documentation & Compliance
Compliance Checklist: How to be GDPR Compliant
Modules
.legal AI
All AI features →Integrations
See all integrations →Platform & features
Understand the rules
See it in action
All customer stories →Plan your switch
Stay up to date
A DSAR is a request from a person for a copy of the personal data you hold about them. You have one month to answer, extendable by two further months. Here is what to provide, when you can refuse or charge, and a step-by-step process with a checklist you can copy.
A DSAR, or data subject access request, is a request from an individual asking an organisation to confirm whether it processes their personal data and, if it does, to give them a copy of that data along with information about how it is used. Under the GDPR you must respond without undue delay and at the latest within one month of receiving the request. If the request is complex, or the person has sent several, you can extend that by two further months, provided you tell them within the first month and explain why.
The right behind the request is the right of access in Article 15 GDPR. The time limits, fees and refusal rules sit in Article 12. This article covers both, together with the European Data Protection Board's (EDPB) final Guidelines 01/2022 on the right of access, and closes with a short note for organisations that also answer requests under the UK GDPR.
DSAR stands for data subject access request. The "data subject" is the person the data is about. The UK regulator, the ICO, usually just says subject access request, or SAR. The two terms mean the same thing.
A DSAR is a request to see your own data. People sometimes use the term loosely for any privacy request, such as erasure or rectification, but those are separate data subject rights with their own conditions. If one email asks for access and erasure, treat it as two requests that share a deadline.
Three points from the EDPB guidelines catch many organisations out:
Anyone whose personal data you process can make a request: customers, users, employees and former employees, job applicants, suppliers' contacts and prospects. A third party can also make one on the person's behalf, such as a parent for a child, a solicitor for a client or an online portal the person uses to send requests. You are entitled to check that the third party really has authority to act.

The subject access request time limit is set by Article 12(3) GDPR: without undue delay and in any event within one month of receipt. One month is a calendar month, not 30 days. The EDPB applies the EU rules on time periods (Regulation 1182/71), which give the following results:
| Situation | Deadline | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Standard request received on 5 March | 5 April at the latest | Art. 12(3); EDPB para. 160 |
| Request received on 31 August (no 31 September) | 30 September, the last day of the following month | EDPB para. 160 |
| Last day falls on a weekend or public holiday | The next working day | EDPB para. 161 |
| Complex request, or several requests from the same person | Up to two further months (three in total), if you tell the person within the first month and give reasons | Art. 12(3); EDPB para. 162 |
| You have reasonable doubts about identity and ask for more information | The clock can be suspended until you receive it, provided you asked without undue delay | Art. 12(6); EDPB para. 159 |
| You process a large quantity of data and ask the person to specify the request | The clock can be suspended in the same way | Recital 63; EDPB para. 159 |
| You decide not to act on the request | Tell the person without delay and within one month, with reasons and their right to complain and go to court | Art. 12(4) |
The clock starts when the request reaches you through one of your official channels, not when it reaches the privacy team. A request that sits for ten days in a sales inbox has used ten days. That is the most common reason deadlines are missed.
Treat the extension as the exception. The EDPB says it should not be overused, and that a controller which often needs it probably has to improve its general procedures. Article 12(3) ties the extension to the complexity and number of the requests, not to your own workload.
For UK readers, the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 amended the UK GDPR in two ways that matter here. Section 76 inserted a new Article 12A, in force since 5 February 2026. The one-month period now runs from the latest of three points: receipt of the request, receipt of any identity information you asked for, and payment of any fee you were entitled to charge. Where you reasonably need more information to identify what the request relates to, the time from asking to receiving the answer does not count. The ICO calls this "stopping the clock". Section 78, in force since Royal Assent in June 2025, makes clear that the person is entitled only to what you can provide on the basis of a reasonable and proportionate search. The ICO's guide to subject access was updated on 16 July 2026 to reflect both changes. None of this applies under the EU GDPR. If you answer requests in both regimes, use the stricter EU starting point.
A complete answer has two parts: a copy of the personal data, and the supplementary information listed in Article 15(1) and (2).
Article 15(3) requires you to provide a copy of the personal data undergoing processing. The EDPB reads "copy" broadly: the copy must be complete and something the person can keep and come back to. It does not always mean copies of the original documents. But in Case C-307/22 (26 October 2023) the Court of Justice held that the person must receive a faithful and intelligible reproduction of all the data. That includes copies of whole documents where this is essential for checking that the data is accurate and complete, or for understanding it.
The guidelines add some practical consequences.
Alongside the copy, Article 15 requires you to tell the person the following.
On recipients, the EDPB expects you to name the actual recipients, unless that is impossible or the request is manifestly unfounded or excessive. If you can only give categories, make them specific: type of recipient, sector and location. Most of this information should already be in your privacy notice and your record of processing activities. The difference is that a DSAR answer must be specific to the requester, not generic.
Where there is a lot of data, a layered response can help: a short overview first, then the detail. The EDPB accepts this when it genuinely helps the person, and every layer must be available at the same time if they want it.
The GDPR sets the outcome, not the procedure. The process below is the one we see work in practice. Each step maps to a rule in Article 12 or 15.

In a group of companies, decide early which entity is the controller for the data in question. Where several entities process the requester's data, coordinate the search across the group so the person gets one coherent answer within one deadline.
The starting point is that a DSAR is free and must be answered. Article 12(5) allows two exceptions, and you carry the burden of proving that they apply.
The first copy is always free. The Court of Justice confirmed in C-307/22 that this holds even where the person wants the data for a purpose other than checking that the processing is lawful, for example to bring a claim against you. For further copies you may charge a reasonable fee based on administrative costs (Article 15(3)). According to the EDPB, that fee must reflect the cost of the extra copy and must not include overheads. You may also charge a reasonable fee instead of refusing when a request is manifestly unfounded or excessive.
Where a request is manifestly unfounded or excessive, in particular because it is repetitive, you may refuse to act on it or charge a reasonable fee. Both terms are narrow:
The EDPB lists what does not make a request excessive: the person gives no reason, you think the request is pointless, the language is rude, or the person intends to use the data in a claim against you. Nor can a request be excessive solely because answering it takes a lot of time and effort.
Article 15(4) protects the rights and freedoms of others, including trade secrets and intellectual property. It allows you to leave out or redact the affected parts. It does not allow you to refuse the whole request.
If you refuse, in full or in part, Article 12(4) requires you to tell the person within one month, give your reasons and inform them that they can complain to a supervisory authority and seek a judicial remedy.
Copy the checklist below into your procedure. It follows the order of the steps above.
| Checkpoint | Done when |
|---|---|
| Request logged | Date of receipt, channel, requester and type of request recorded |
| Deadline set | One-month deadline and an internal review date in the tracker |
| Acknowledgement sent | Requester knows the expected response date and a contact person |
| Identity and authority confirmed | Proportionate check documented, or reasons why none was needed |
| Scope agreed | All data, or the specific information the requester asked for |
| Search completed | Every system in the record of processing activities checked, processors included, search log saved |
| Review and redaction done | Third-party data and protected information removed, reasons recorded |
| Extension decided | Either not needed, or the requester told within one month with reasons |
| Response sent | Copy plus Article 15 information delivered securely, before the deadline |
| File closed | Correspondence, decisions and proof of delivery stored |
A response letter can follow this structure:
Organisations in Denmark can also use the Danish Data Protection Agency's templates (in Danish) for the information part of the answer.

Infringements of the data subject rights in Articles 12 to 22 fall in the higher fine bracket of Article 83(5)(b): up to EUR 20 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. The right of access is also where two of the seven GDPR principles become concrete for one person: transparency, and accountability, which means you must be able to show that you answered properly. A weak DSAR process is usually a sign of wider gaps.
In .legal's GDPR module you can log each request, track the deadline and keep the correspondence and decisions in one place. Your record of processing activities then shows which systems, processors and retention rules apply when you search. Book a demo to see how it works.
DSAR stands for data subject access request. It is a request from an individual to an organisation for confirmation of whether their personal data is processed, a copy of that data and information about how it is used. The right comes from Article 15 GDPR.
You must respond without undue delay and at the latest within one month of receiving the request. A request received on 5 March must be answered by 5 April. If the request is complex or the person has made several, you can extend by two further months, but you must tell them within the first month and explain why.
Yes. SAR (subject access request) is the term the UK regulator, the ICO, mostly uses, while DSAR is common elsewhere. Both refer to the right of access in Article 15 of the GDPR or the UK GDPR.
Not for the first copy, which is always free, even if the person wants the data to bring a claim against you. You may charge a reasonable fee based on administrative costs for further copies, or where a request is manifestly unfounded or excessive. The fee must reflect the actual cost and must not include overheads.
Only if the request is manifestly unfounded or excessive, typically because it is repetitive, and you must be able to prove it. A request is not excessive just because it takes a lot of work, gives no reason or is meant to support a claim against you. If you refuse, you must tell the person within one month, give your reasons and inform them of their right to complain and go to court.
You may ask for more information if you have reasonable doubts about who is asking. The check must be proportionate. If the person is logged in to their account that is normally enough, and the EDPB considers a copy of an ID card generally not appropriate. Under the EU GDPR the clock can be suspended while you wait for the information, provided you asked without undue delay.
Yes, to the extent they contain the person's personal data. You must provide a copy of that data, and the Court of Justice has held that this includes copies of documents where they are needed to understand the data or check its accuracy. Other people's personal data must be redacted, but you cannot withhold whole documents for that reason.
A copy of the personal data plus the information in Article 15: purposes, categories of data, recipients, storage period, the source of the data, the person's other rights, the right to complain to a supervisory authority, any automated decision-making and the safeguards for transfers outside the EU/EEA. The EDPB expects named recipients rather than vague categories wherever possible.
Want to learn more about data subject rights, personal data breaches and GDPR compliance? Explore our articles on the topic here.
.legal compliance platform