Skip to content

Know who has signed off which version of the policy

By policy we mean the management-approved document your colleagues have to follow. In .legal, publishing a version and asking for sign-off are two separate acts, and each version keeps its own sign-off log, so you can see who signed off v1.0 and who is still missing on v2.0.

Unlimited users  •  Free onboarding and support  •  No commitment

Illustration of three policy documents standing in a row, each with its own tray of sign-off checks: the two older versions fully ticked, the front one with two still open, a separate publish button standing apart, and a line from the front version out to three people
+400 companies use .legal
Region Sjælland
Aarhus Universitet
aj_vaccines_logo
Realdania
Right People
IO Gates
PLO
Finans Danmark
geia-food
Evida
Klasselotteriet
NRGI1
BLUE WATER SHIPPING
Karnov
Ingvard Christensen
VP Securities
AH Industries
Lægeforeningen
InMobile
AK Nygart
DEIF
DMJX
Axel logo
qUINT Logo
KAUFMANN (1)
SMILfonden-logo
kurhotel_skodsborg
nemlig.com
Molecule Consultancy
Novicell
The Policies overview in .legal, listing seven policies, guidelines and procedures with published date, responsible, approver, type, current version or draft, linked controls and status

Policy sign-off

Meridian's security policy is on v2.0, and Anders can see who has signed off

Anders Krogh published version 2.0 of Meridian Nordic's information security policy on a Tuesday morning, and nothing happened. Nobody got an email, which was exactly the point, because the section on privileged access that came in with this version wasn't written for 850 colleagues. He opened the Recipients and sign-offs tab, chose v2.0, picked the group of contacts on the IT business area, added the two external consultants on the network project by name and email, and sent it. By Friday the sign-off progress on v2.0 showed most of the circle in, and two still outstanding.

  • Publishing made v2.0 the version in force and locked it, without telling anyone.
  • The round went to the IT group and two named consultants, and v1.0 keeps its own log.
  • The consultants signed off without a user account in the platform.
  • Anders chased the last two himself, with a reminder from the platform to each of them.

  • Publishing is quiet

    Publishing makes a version current and locks it. Asking for sign-off is a separate act you start when it makes sense.

  • One log per version

    Each version keeps its own sign-off log, so v1.0 and v2.0 never blur into one list.

  • No account needed

    External recipients sign off with a name and an email address. They don't need a user in the platform.

  • No stale status on paper

    Sections link to controls in your active frameworks, and the controls are left out of the PDF on purpose, so a printout never carries a status that has moved on.

Illustration of one policy document on a shelf with several faded copies fanned out behind it, and a stack of envelopes off to the side whose broken line never reaches the document

Policy sign-off

A PDF on the intranet can't tell you who read which version

Most security policies live as a file. The file gets replaced, the name picks up a v3-final at the end, and the record of who read what is an email thread.

  • The intranet copy is whatever was uploaded last, with no trace of what it replaced.
  • Nobody can say which version the network team actually read last spring.
  • Reading confirmations, if there are any, sit in someone's inbox rather than next to the version they belong to.
The Version history tab of an information security policy, listing four published versions with date, approver, description of changes, related controls, recipients and how many have signed off each

Policy sign-off

Publishing and sign-off are two separate acts

Publishing makes a draft the current version and locks it. Publishing doesn't notify anyone, and that's deliberate.

  • Sign-off is its own round, started from the Recipients and sign-offs tab, for the version you choose.
  • The round is optional for each version, so a corrected comma doesn't have to land in anybody's inbox.
  • Each version keeps its own sign-off log, so who signed off v1.0 and who is still missing on v2.0 are two separate answers.
Compare versions in .legal, with the current version and the draft side by side, the changed section highlighted and a count of added, removed, modified and unchanged sections

Policy sign-off

You choose the version number, from the changes

Every published version carries a short description of what changed, and a person decides how big the change was.

  • An editorial change takes v1.0 to v1.1 and a substantive one takes it to v2.0. The call is yours, made from the diff.
  • Compare any two versions side by side or inline, no matter how far apart they are.
  • The approver is stored on each version, and the right to publish sits with that role.
The Recipients and sign-offs tab on a policy, filtered to version 3, with one recipient signed on version 3.0 and one not yet signed on version 3.1, each with the date it was sent

Policy sign-off

A group, a colleague or a consultant

You choose who a version goes to for sign-off: a group, individual users, or external recipients by name and email. A group is the contacts grouped on a business area, so you can send to everyone in IT.

  • External recipients don't need a user account to receive the policy and sign off.
  • The recipient list is remembered, so the next version can go to the same recipients without building it again.
  • The same grouping is used when you send awareness material.
Illustration of a policy document divided into sections, with lines running from individual sections and from the longer last section to a column of control tiles

Policy sign-off

Anchored to controls, as lightly as suits you

A section or subsection can be linked to controls in the frameworks you've made active, and the link runs both ways.

  • Link section by section, put every relevant control in one closing section, or map from the framework side. All three work.
  • From a control you can see which policies it's anchored in, and which version.
  • The count of linked controls shows in the overview and on each version, so a gap is visible when the policy changes.
Illustration of a person holding up a card with a check mark beside a policy document, a separate quiz panel of answer circles set apart on its own platform, and a single envelope resting in the foreground

Policy sign-off

A tick is a confirmation, not a test

The recipient reads the policy and has to confirm they've read and understood it. That's what the log records, and here's what it doesn't.

  • The recipient sees the policy itself, with controls and recurring tasks stripped out.
  • If you need to know they understood it, that's a knowledge check, and it runs on the audit engine.
  • Nobody is chased on a schedule. A reminder goes from the platform to one person at a time, when somebody sends it.
.legal in practice

Features for policy sign-off

A draft beside the version in force

Work in a draft while the current version still applies. Write in the editor's sections and subsections, or start with Import policy from document and tidy the formatting by hand afterwards.

Versions you can compare

Every version is kept with its description of changes. Pick any two and compare them side by side or inline, then choose between an editorial and a substantive increment.

One PDF per published version

Publishing generates a PDF and adds it under the Documents tab, one per version. Controls are left out on purpose, because a printed control status would be wrong the day after.

Sections linked to controls

Link sections and subsections to controls in your active frameworks. From the control you can see which policies are linked to it.

Recipients and sign-offs, per version

Sign-off is a separate round, sent from the Recipients and sign-offs tab for the version you choose, and each version keeps its own log. Send it to a group (the contacts on one business area, such as IT), to individual users, or to external recipients by name and email, who don't need to be users in the platform.

Sign-off progress where you look

Sign-off progress shows as a column in the Policies overview and per version in the version history. A reminder goes from the platform to one person at a time.

Policy sign-off

Frameworks this covers

Two frameworks that expect the policy to exist, and a policy that can point back at their controls.

  • icon-framework-ISO

    ISO 27001

    ISO 27001 expects documented policies. Once the framework is active, a policy section can be linked to its controls, and from each control you can see which policies are linked to it.

    Read about ISO 27001
  • icon-framework-NIS2

    NIS2

    NIS2 expects documented security policies as well. With NIS2 active, policy sections link to its controls the same way, alongside ISO 27001 if you run both.

    Read about NIS2
.legal compliance platform

Track policy sign-off with...

Do you need to know who has signed off which version of your policy? We recommend the following module for that task.

Information Security Management

The frameworks and controls a policy section links to live here. It's information security management as documentation, so the platform records the work rather than monitoring your systems.

Explore Information Security Management

Our Customers

+400

companies

+11.000

users

+79.000

contracts

+14.000

processing activities

Mikkel Friis

Bech-Bruun

Mikkel Friis Rossa (Partner)

.legal's team has consistently demonstrated a commitment to innovation while being responsive to the needs of our mutual clients.

Rasmus-boutrup-fenerum

Fenerum

Rasmus Boutrup (Financial Controller)

Case Study
With .legal, we've gained a simpler and more manageable solution that better suits our needs
Michael Berner 1

Lægeforeningen

Michael Berner (Lawyer)

.legal has been the right choice for us. .legal are professional and welcoming with skilled employees.
Nanna Rodian Christensen

Molecule Consultancy

Nanna Rodian Christensen (HR & Operational Manager)

Case Study
Firstly, it means that not all the work is in one place (me), and secondly, that the understanding of GDPR is implemented throughout the organisation.
ulrikdueholmbeckmann

Plum Safety

Ulrik Dueholm Beckmann (QC, CM og ESG Lead)

Case Study
From .legal, we experience an incredibly high degree of flexibility and willingness to adapt features to our local needs.
julie-oxenvad-novicell

Novicell

Julie Oxenvad (Legal Consultant)

Case Study
We are satisfied with the switch to .legal – it has strengthened our compliance work, made processes easier to manage and more transparent, and improved cross-team collaboration
Tinna Schultz

Min By Media

Tinna Schultz (HR Manager)

Case Study
It just works! It is so easy and user-friendly, and the overview of processing activities is brilliant.
ansat_Kaspar_Rochholz_005

DMJX

Kaspar Rochholz (GDPR Coordinator)

Case Study
.legal has really understood what it means to create a user-friendly and efficient solution. Privacy is an attractive product compared to price and functionality.
Profile-picture1

Axel Kaufmann ApS

Julie Lundkvist Andreasen (Lawyer and Head of Costumer Service)

Case Study
.legal continuously update the platform to ensure their customers always remain compliant. In our view, any other choice would be a downgrade.

NRGi

Mette Mühlendorph (Compliance Specialist)

Case Study
The implementation of .legal has made a difference in the way we handle compliance. The system has created structure and overview, which has had concrete benefits.
Use cases

Find the job you need done

Every use case is a real piece of compliance work, told the way it actually runs in the platform. Filter by who you are, what you work with, and which frameworks you answer to.

Book demo

22 use cases

Compliance & GRC lead

Run awareness training that reaches every colleague

Send out training and policies, chase the stragglers automatically, and prove every colleague completed it. You bring the material, we run the rails.
See awareness training
CISO & IT security

Run your ISMS in one platform

The frameworks you answer to, the controls beneath them and the documentation that proves the work happened, all three in one module, with status updating itself from completed tasks.
See how the ISMS runs
CISO & IT security

Achieve and maintain ISO 27001 certification

The certificate is won at the audit and kept alive in the years between. Work the controls under the standard's own numbering and plan the whole cycle in one pass.
See the certification route
Compliance & GRC lead

Hand over everything a colleague was responsible for

Somebody leaves and their name is still on contracts, processing activities, assets and the tasks that document your controls. One table lists every place they are named as responsible, and you hand each role to the colleague who should have it.
See the handover
Compliance & GRC lead

Manage compliance across a group of companies

Run every company in the group from one platform, document once at group level, and still report entity by entity. Delivered by the Group Companies add-on.
See group compliance
Legal counsel

Run due diligence on your vendors

Classify a vendor on your own criteria, get the answers and documents you need with no login for them, and move the approved ones straight into contracts.
See vendor due diligence
Compliance & GRC lead

Multi-framework compliance: do the work once

Do a control once and it counts across every framework it maps to, with a simulated score on the ones you haven't started yet.
See multi-framework compliance
CISO & IT security

Get NIS2-ready without starting from scratch

Build on the ISO 27001 work you've already done, switch NIS2 on, and let a simulated score show how far ahead you already are.
See NIS2 readiness

Frequently Asked Questions about policy versions and sign-off

Does publishing a new version send it to anyone?

No. Publishing doesn't notify anyone. It makes the draft the current version, locks it and generates a PDF of it. Asking for sign-off is a separate act, started from the Recipients and sign-offs tab, for the version you want confirmed, and it's optional for each version. Each version keeps its own sign-off log, so you can see who signed off v1.0 and who is still missing on v2.0.

Can we send a policy to a group?

Yes. You can send a policy version for sign-off to a group as well as to individual users and to external recipients by name and email. A group is a set of contacts grouped on a business area, for example everyone in IT, so you can send the version to all of IT at once. The same grouping is used when you send awareness material. The recipient list is kept, so the next version can go to the same recipients. Everyone else can read the policy through a read-only link that can't be guessed, for example on the intranet, and you choose whether that link is public.

Can consultants outside the company sign off?

Yes. External recipients are added by name and email and don't need to be users in the platform to receive the policy and sign off. What they see is the policy itself, with the controls and recurring tasks stripped out, because the reader needs the content, not your control status. To sign off, they confirm they've read and understood it.

Does a sign-off prove that people understood the policy?

It proves they confirmed it. The recipient has to state that they've read and understood the policy, and the log records that confirmation against the version. If you need to know whether the content actually landed, that's a knowledge check with questions and answers, which runs on the audit engine instead. The two sit well together, and the awareness training use case shows the other half.

How do we chase people who haven't signed off?

From the platform, one person at a time. If someone hasn't signed off, you can send them a reminder directly, and the Recipients and sign-offs tab shows who hasn't signed off yet. Nothing goes out on a schedule by itself, so chasing is a decision somebody makes, not a cadence running in the background.

When we publish v2.0, do we need a new sign-off round?

That's your call, version by version. You can send v2.0 for sign-off, and it gets its own log next to the one for v1.0, or you can publish a small editorial fix without a round at all. The platform doesn't make that decision, and publishing doesn't start a round.

When the auditor asks which version was in force

Do we have to link every section to a control?

No. You can link section by section, gather every relevant control in one closing section, or start from the framework and map its controls to the policy. Whichever route you take, a control shows which policies are linked to it. Pick the level of upkeep you can actually sustain.

What Annex A controls are

Why aren't the controls in the PDF?

Because a printed control status is wrong the day after it's printed. Publishing generates a PDF of the version and adds it under the Documents tab, one per version, and the controls are deliberately left out. Inside the platform the policy shows its linked controls with their current status, so that's where to look.

Will .legal write the policy for us?

No. We build the plan, not the filling-in. The editor is empty on purpose, so the structure and the wording are yours. If the policy already exists, Import policy from document spreads it across sections, and you'll normally need to tidy the formatting by hand afterwards. If you want a starting point, standard policy texts are available as Word files, which you edit outside the platform.

Is Policy Management part of the platform as standard?

No. Policy Management is an add-on, and it's the part of the platform this page describes. The controls a policy section links to sit in the frameworks you have made active.

Policy Management

Still unsure?

Ask Johannes directly, he runs most demos personally

Book him here
+400 companies use .legal
Region Sjælland
Aarhus Universitet
aj_vaccines_logo
Realdania
Right People
IO Gates
PLO
Finans Danmark
geia-food
Evida
Klasselotteriet
NRGI1
BLUE WATER SHIPPING
Karnov
Ingvard Christensen
VP Securities
AH Industries
Lægeforeningen
InMobile
AK Nygart
DEIF
DMJX
Axel logo
qUINT Logo
KAUFMANN (1)
SMILfonden-logo
kurhotel_skodsborg
nemlig.com
Molecule Consultancy
Novicell